🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an international accord created to protect women from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in the capital this past week to oppose the vote. The final authority now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last year, requiring authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of exiting from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations described as a major setback for women's rights.

Political Debate and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its focus on equal rights weakens family values and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, MPs voted 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a move sponsored by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the main parties supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent decision has sparked widespread outcry both inside the country and abroad.

22,000 people have signed a national appeal calling for the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that Latvia had made a hasty decision driven by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey left the convention four years ago, instances of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds support, the president could potentially send back the legislation for additional consideration if he has objections.

President the national leader announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to legal requirements, "considering governmental and judicial factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in Latvia but across the continent," commented a human rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been rising in multiple European nations
• The European treaty mandates specific legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect similar discussions in additional EU countries