🔗 Share this article

The real-life crime genre has an innovative format, or perhaps even a whole new language and structure: officer-worn camera recordings. Countenances of those harmed, witnesses and potential offenders appear suddenly to the cameras, sometimes in the intense brightness of headlights or flashlights as the police arrive, their faces and voices expressing caution or fear or indignation or dubiously feigned naivety. And we often catch sight of the expressions of the law enforcement personnel, one standing by blankly while the other asks the questions with what occasionally seems like remarkable hesitation – though maybe this is because they know they are being recorded.

A Growing Trend in Documentary Filmmaking

We have already had the Netflix real-life crime film The Gabby Petito Case, about the slaying of an Instagram influencer by her boyfriend, whose primary focus was body cam footage and in which, as in this film, the police seemed surprisingly lenient with the perpetrator. There is also the acclaimed short film Incident by Bill Morrison, made exclusively of body cam film. Now comes Geeta Gandbhir’s documentary about the tragic incident of a Florida mother in Ocala, Florida, a woman of colour whose children allegedly harassed and tormented her neighbor, a local resident. In 2023, after an escalating series of neighbour-dispute incidents in which the authorities were summoned multiple times, the accused shot Owens dead through her locked door, when the victim went to Lorincz’s house to address her about throwing objects at her children.

The Police Inquiry and State Laws

The arresting officers found evidence that Lorincz had done internet searches into Florida’s “stand your ground” laws, which permit householders and others to use firearms if there is a significant presumption of threat. The movie builds its story with the body cam footage captured during the multiple officer calls to the scene before the killing, and then at the disturbing and disordered crime scene itself – prefaced by emergency call recordings of Lorincz contacting authorities in a melodramatically shaky voice. There is also police cell footage of the individual which has a chilly, queasy fascination.

Depiction of the Suspect

The documentary does not really imply anything too complicated about Lorincz, or any mitigating factors. She is obviously disturbed, although the kids are heard calling her “the Karen”, an hurtful taunt. The production is showcased as an example of how “stand your ground” laws lead to unnecessary and heartbreaking violence. But the reality of gun ownership and the second amendment (that longstanding U.S. legal right that a late commentator famously claimed made firearm fatalities a necessary cost) is not much highlighted.

Officer Questioning and Firearm Norms

It is possible to watch the police interrogation scenes here and feel astonished at how minimal concern the police took in this aspect. When did she buy her gun? Did she receive any instruction on handling it? Had she ever had occasion to fire it before? How was the gun kept in her home? Could it have been easily accessible and prepared? The police aren’t shown asking any of these undoubtedly important questions (though they may have done in footage that didn’t make the edit). Or is possessing a firearm so commonplace it would be like asking about kitchen appliances or bread heaters?

Detention and Consequences

For what appeared to her neighbors a very long time, the suspect was not even taken into custody and indicted, only held and even offered a hotel stay away from home for the night (another parallel, by the way, with the Gabby Petito case). And when she was ultimately officially taken into custody in the holding cell, there is an extraordinary sequence in which Lorincz simply refuses to stand, will not extend her arms for the cuffs, not hostilely, but with the politely self-pitying air of someone whose psychological state means that she is unable to comply. Had the kid-gloves treatment up until that point encouraged her to think that this could be effective?

Conclusion and Verdict

It didn’t; and the panel's decision is saved for the end titles. A very sombre portrayal of U.S. justice and consequences.